Legal Opinion

City of Birmingham v. Norwood

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 25, 1930No. 6 Div. 536PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The complaint was for damages against the city of Birmingham. It charged that there was an obstruction or stoppage in the city’s sewer, which “was the proximate consequence of said city’s negligence in not exercising reasonable care to keep said city sewer free of stoppage or obstruction.” The other feature -or alternative of the complaint was held .good by the Court of Appeals and petitioner complains that the Court of Appeals was in error in declaring that the alternative averment above copied was defective and subject to demurrer because it failed to allege notice of the alleged…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Birmingham Amusement Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. City of Birmingham v. CarleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Arndt v. City of CullmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  4. Alabama Power Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. City of Montgomery v. FergusonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. City of Tuscaloosa v. FairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Morgan v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Brown v. City of FairhopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. City of Bessemer v. ChambersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. City of Birmingham v. FlowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API