Legal Opinion

Marcum v. Ballot Com'rs

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1896PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brannon, Judge:

A question presents itself which, I confess, has greatly perplexed me, requiring close thought and nice discrimination for its solution. Does mandamus lie in this case? Until our present election law, called the “Australian Ballot,” courts did not know political parties as such. They had no status as such in legal contests except in congress and other political bodies, but under the new election law they have distinctive legal existence whenever questions arising under it come before the courts.

Two certificates of nomination forjudge of the eighth circuit, emanating from two…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American Casualty Insurance & Security Co. v. FylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  2. State v. County CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Lewis v. WhittleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1883
  4. Miller v. County Court of Tucker CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Doolittle v. County Court of Cabell CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Dadisman v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Allen v. State of West Virginia Human Rights CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Daniel v. SimmsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. State ex rel. Smith v. County CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. White v. ManchinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API