Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Heimov v. Thomson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 5, 1944PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
On June 30, 1933, the state liquor control commission issued a restaurant permit to the plaintiff Max Heimov for the sale of beer and wine for consumption on the premises known as 980 Farmington Avenue, West Hartford. On May 10, 1933, the commission had issued a similar permit for the premises known as 967 Farmington Avenue. On these dates there were no zoning regulations in effect in West Hartford which regulated or restricted the sale of alcoholic liquors within the town.
Amendments to the statutes effective July 1, 1935, provided for restaurant permits for the sale of beer only and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- State Ex Rel. Foote v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- State v. EricksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- American Casualty Insurance & Security Co. v. FylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
- Work v. United States Ex Rel. McAlester-Edwards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- State v. BunkleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- United Aircraft Corporation v. FusariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- McAdams v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.