Legal Opinion

Fortis Corp. v. Northeast Forest Products

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1984No. 8317DC828PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s conclusions of law regarding material breach of contract and breach of specific warranty of fitness for intended use on the ground that the trial court’s findings of fact were inadequate to support its conclusions of law. Defendant also assigns error to the award of monetary damages on the ground that the trial court failed to make sufficient factual findings and conclusions of law with respect to the issue of damages.

Initially, we note that defendant has failed to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure in preparing the brief…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. West v. G. D. Reddick, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Marsico v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Wurlitzer Distributing Corp. v. SchofieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. West v. G.D. Reddick, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Trotter v. HewittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re J.A.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Matheson v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Crocker v. Delta Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Smith v. HeathCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API