Wurlitzer Distributing Corp. v. Schofield
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Chief Judge.
Under G.S. 39-15, a conveyance made with the intent to defraud creditors is void. A claim seeking to set aside a deed as a fraudulent conveyance can be established in accordance with legal principles set out in the landmark case of Aman v. Walker, 165 N.C. 224, 81 S.E. 162 (1914), as applied in the recent case of North Carolina National Bank v. Evans, 296 N.C. 374, 250 S.E. 2d 231 (1979):
“(1) If the conveyance is voluntary, and the grantor retains property fully sufficient and available to pay his debts then existing, and there is no actual intent to defraud, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Williams v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Aman v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Edwards v. Northwestern BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Nytco Leasing, Inc. v. Southeastern Motels, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Morris v. HollandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States Leasing Corp. v. Everett, Creech, Hancock & HerzigCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Fortis Corp. v. Northeast Forest ProductsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Smith-Douglass v. KornegayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Thomas A. Wilkinson, III v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Cobb v. SpurlinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.