Legal Opinion

Marsico v. Adams

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1980No. 7925SC1123PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

Defendants properly bring forth an argument in their appellate brief and state in part that, “... at least nominal damages should be awarded byway of a setoff.... ” Defendants base their argument on their assignment of error #13 and exception #28. When we look to the record, however, no exception #28 is apparent.

Appellate Rule 10(b) states that,

Each exception shall be set out immediately following the record of judicial action to which it is addressed .... Exceptions set out in the record on appeal shall be numbered consecutively ....

The Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Craver v. CraverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Hutton & Bourbonnais, Inc. v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Hairston v. . Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Herbie's PlaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Hummel v. Mid Dakota Clinic, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Wiseman v. WisemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API