Legal Opinion

In re J.A.A.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 2005No. COA05-105PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Respondent-mother appeals the district court's order terminating her parental rights to two of her children, J.A. and S.A. For the reasons discussed herein, we affirm.

Because respondent-mother has not assigned error to any of the trial court's findings of fact, they are binding on appeal. Koufman v. Koufman, 330 N.C. 93, 97, 408 S.E.2d 729, 731 (1991). Those findings establish the following facts. Respondent-mother is the natural mother of four children, two of whom are the subject of this appeal. The minor children's legal father was incarcerated during the time the following…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Koufman v. KoufmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. In re B.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. In Re BakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Fran's Pecans, Inc. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. In re T.L.H.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
  2. In re T.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. In re Y.Y.E.T.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. In re A.R.H.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. In re S.N.H.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API