Legal Opinion
Tashima v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 7, 1989No. CV-88-4582 SAWPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEIGEL, District Judge.
Petitioner/plaintiff, the Honorable A. Wallace Tashima, United States district judge in the Central District of California (petitioner), brings this action to compel respondents/defendants, Administrative Office of the United States Courts and L. Ralph Mecham, Director (respondents or Administrative Office), to authorize payment for his private counsel in two lawsuits. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment.
I. Background.
Petitioner has been named a defendant in two actions challenging the constitutionality of Local Rule 2.2.1 1…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Muirhead v. MechamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- A. Wallace Tashima, United States District Judge v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts L. Ralph Mecham, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Novell, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Novell, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Church of Scientology Int'l v. KoltsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.