Legal Opinion
Hoboken Manufacturers' R. v. United States
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 24, 1942No. Civ. No. 1100PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff, Hoboken Manufacturers' Railroad Company (referred to hereafter as Hoboken), in the case at bar seeks to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, dated July 24, 1939, finding, after full hearing, that the divisions received by Hoboken out of joint class and commodity rates on traffic interchanged by it with Seatrain Lines, Inc., were not unjust or inequitable.
The plaintiff is a short switching railroad which runs along the waterfront of Hoboken, New Jersey. It connects with the Erie Railroad and through the Erie with other trunk line…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- New England Divisions CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Pac. T. T. Co. v. D.P.S.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- State ex rel. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Department of Public ServiceWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Hoboken Manufacturers' RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Seatrain Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1946
- Pennsylvania R. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.