Legal Opinion

Lafawnda Williams v. Matthew Mccandlis

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 8, 2020No. 79058-7Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON LAFAWNDA WILLIAMS, DIVISION ONE Appellant, No. 79058-7-I v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION MATTHEW McCANDLIS, and JANE DOE McCANDLIS, husband and wife and the marital community composed thereof, Respondent. DWYER, J. — LaFawnda Williams appeals from the dismissal of her suit against Matthew McCandlis. Because Williams failed to serve McCandlis with a copy of the summons and complaint within either the applicable statutory limitation period or the 90-day tolling period allotted for service of process, her complaint is time-barred. Accordingly, we affirm.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. DeHeer v. Seattle Post-IntelligencerWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Quinn v. Cherry Lane Auto Plaza, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API