Quinn v. Cherry Lane Auto Plaza, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 The trier-of-fact did not find Rob Quinn’s evidence compelling and entered a judgment for the defendants. Mr. Quinn appeals. This court does not reweigh evidence and make its own factual determinations. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
Korsmo, J.
FACTS
¶2 This case revolves around Mr. Quinn’s efforts to purchase a used 2003 Chevrolet Silverado truck from respondent Cherry Lane Auto Plaza Inc. Michael Lilley purchased the vehicle at auction for Cherry Lane. The odometer cluster did not properly illuminate, so a replacement cluster was ordered from a used parts dealer on December 21,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. EtheridgeWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Suiter v. Mitchell Motor Coach Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- State v. WaldenburgCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Bale v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Jensen v. Lake Jane EstatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Kitsap County v. Kitsap Rifle & Revolver ClubCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Minehart v. MORNING STAR BOYS RANCH, INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.