Legal Opinion

State v. . Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1945PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

Tbe exceptive assignments brought forward and debated by defendant in brief on this appeal bave been examined and found to be without merit.

First: Tbe evidence as to exclamation of tbe witness Lula Stevens at tbe time tbe fire was discovered on tbe outside of tbe bouse where sbe bad just seen defendant is competent as a part of tbe res gestee. Tbe subject bas been fully discussed in many decisions of this Court, among which are these: S. v. Spivey, 151 N. C., 676, 65 S. E., 995; Batchelor v. R. R., 196 N. C., 84, 144 S. E., 542. See also 20 Am. Jur., 551, Evidence, sections 661, 662, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. Star Manufacturing Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Batchelor v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. State v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. State v. . MillicanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. . BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. State v. . CogdaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. State v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API