Smith v. Esslinger
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SILLS, P. J.
— The trustees of an inter vivas trust appeal from an order determining that the plaintiff beneficiary had not violated the trust’s “no contest” clause by filing the underlying petition. Because we hold the trustees do not have standing to appeal the order, we dismiss the appeal.
I
Paul and Marie Esslinger established an inter vivas trust in 1976 known as the Esslinger Family Trust. When Paul died in 1982, the trust corpus was divided into trust A, a revocable trust containing Marie’s share of the trust property, and trust B, an irrevocable trust containing the balance of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Burch v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Estate of BunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Graham v. LenziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Estate of GouletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Estate of GouletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Estate of GouletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995