Estate of Goulet
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
KENNARD, J., Dissenting.
It has long been settled, not only in California but elsewhere, that a fiduciary (such as the trustee of a trust or the personal representative of a decedent’s estate) administering property on behalf of multiple beneficiaries must act impartially towards all the beneficiaries and must not favor, or expend funds litigating, the interest of one beneficiary over another. The fiduciary may not take sides when a dispute arises as to the relative rights and interests of various beneficiaries, and may not work to advance or oppose the claim of any beneficiary.
For that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Goad v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Estate of BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Bryant v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.