Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate of Goulet

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1995No. S042636Published

1Dissent

KENNARD, J., Dissenting.

It has long been settled, not only in California but elsewhere, that a fiduciary (such as the trustee of a trust or the personal representative of a decedent’s estate) administering property on behalf of multiple beneficiaries must act impartially towards all the beneficiaries and must not favor, or expend funds litigating, the interest of one beneficiary over another. The fiduciary may not take sides when a dispute arises as to the relative rights and interests of various beneficiaries, and may not work to advance or oppose the claim of any beneficiary.

For that…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Goad v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Estate of BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Bryant v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API