Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Hryniewicz
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 2, 1999No. AC 16643PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPEAR, J.
The defendants, Paul Hryniewicz and West Service Corporation, are indebted to the plaintiff as a *629result of a judgment in the original amount of $525,000. The plaintiff obtained a postjudgment order for a public sale of Hryniewicz’ shares of stock in Mountain Laurel Realty, Inc. (Mountain Laurel). The trial court thereafter approved the sale for $200,000 and ordered Hryniewicz to transfer the shares of stock to the plaintiff, who was the successful bidder.1
The defendants appeal from the trial court’s order and claim that the trial court improperly approved the sale because (1)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- General American Tank Car Corp. v. El Dorado Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe of Indians v. WeickerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- State v. HendersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Town of Ridgefield v. Eppoliti Realty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Seligson v. BrowerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Grace N' Vessels of Christ Ministries, Inc. v. City of DanburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Altama, LLC v. Napoli Motors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Montanaro v. ASPETUCK LAND TRUST, INC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.