Smith v. Hosmer
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Relator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to ' vacate an order adjudging him guilty of contempt. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
This is an application for a mandamus to compel the respondent to vacate an order adjudging the relator guilty of contempt.
It appears that in January, 1890, the George T. Smith Middlings Purifier Company, a corporation doing business at the city of Jackson, in the county of Jackson, made an assignment under the statute; and that af ter Avar ds a petition Avas filed by certain creditors, in the circuit court for the county of Jackson, praying that the assignees might be ordered to file a new inventory and *565appraisal. Pending consideration of this petition, the assignment, the petition, and all…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hanchett v. WaterburyIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- E. T. Barnum Wire & Iron Works v. SpeedMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- In re MannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Kittridge v. KinneMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by4 opinions
- Steel v. Clinton Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Chapin v. DoddsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- In re the Assignment of George T. Smith Middlings Purifier Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Stanton Trust & Savings Bank v. Northern Montana Ass'n of Credit MenMontana Supreme Court · 1926