Legal Opinion

E. T. Barnum Wire & Iron Works v. Speed

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1886PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Mandamus. Relator applied for a writ of mandamus to compel respondent, one of the circuit judges of Wayne county, to vacate an order made in the chancery court restraining relator from trying an attachment suit, pending in the Superior Court of Detroit, in favor of an alleged creditor of relators, and commenced prior to relators’ assignment of its property, for the benefit of its creditors, under the statute. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, one of the circuit judges of the Wayne circuit court, to vacate and set aside an order entered by him on the twelfth day of November, 1885. On the twenty-eighth day of July, 1884, Henry M. Du field commenced a suit, by attachment, in the Superior Court of Detroit, against the E. T. Barnutn Wire & Iron Works, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of this State, and under said proceedings in attachment secured a levy upon all or nearly all the lands, goods and chattels belonging to said corporation. On or…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Martin v. South Salem Land Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  2. Brooks v. HargraveMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. City of Huron v. CampbellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Coleman v. CallonIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  5. In Re Elliott's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API