Kittridge v. Kinne
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Eelators applied for mandamus to compel the removal of a common-law assignment, and all proceedings thereunder, under How. Stat. §§ 6495-6502, providing for the transfer of causes, etc. The facts are stated, in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.
On January 14, 1890, the George T. Smith Middling Purifier Company, of Jackson, made a common-law assignment, under and in accordance with the provisions of section 8739 of HowelPs Statutes, and the sections following, relating to such assignments.
The relators are creditors. They filed a petition in Jackson circuit court, alleging that the inventory was imperfect, in that it omitted property belonging to the assignor to a large amount; and also that the appraisal was incorrect, in that it greatly undervalued property contained in the inventory. They prayed that the assignee might be ordered,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fraser v. Lapeer Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. Wyman, Partridge & Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Preston National Bank v. George T. Smith Middlings Purifier Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Chapin v. DoddsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Booth v. County CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
- Hyattsville Building Ass'n v. BouicCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.