Legal Opinion

Pagel v. Gisi

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 2, 1955No. 17552PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

These parties appeared in reverse order in the trial court and are hereafter referred to as there, or by name.

This is a class action brought by plaintiffs, who are owners of certain lots in the Hoch Park Addition to the town of Yuma, Colorado, to enforce a general plan of restriction as to the use of the land in said addition. By their complaint plaintiffs alleged that a house trailer parked upon a lot belonging to defendant Pagel violated the restriction that the premises “will be used for dwelling houses only, and that any dwelling that is hereafter erected by the party of the second part,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Evans v. FossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Hayes v. GibbsUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  4. De Gray v. Monmouth Beach Club House Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1892
  5. Burgess v. MagarianSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rhue v. Cheyenne Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  2. Waterhouse v. Capital Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Nance v. WaldropSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  4. McBride v. BehrmanHighland County Court of Common Pleas · 1971
  5. Naiman v. BilodeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API