Legal Opinion
Naiman v. Bilodeau
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided January 27, 1967PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEBBER, Justice.
The plaintiffs seek by injunction to enforce as against the defendant the provisions of a restrictive covenant imposed by deeds from a common grantor. The Justice below denied relief and the plaintiffs have appealed.
The restrictive clause in pertinent part provides:
“The above described lot is conveyed subject to the following restrictions for the benefit of all lots in Cobbosseecontee Shores and binding on the Grantor and Grantee until July 1, 1977, each and all of which restrictions may be enforced or enjoined by the Grantee, but said Grantor shall be under no obligation to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wright v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1964
- Connor v. ClemonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- St. Botolph Club, Inc. v. Brookline Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Hemenway v. BartevianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Pagel v. GisiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kincheloe v. MilatzoWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Kindler v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
- Green v. LawrenceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Robinson v. Board of Appeals, Town of KennebunkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Boehner v. BriggsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.