Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Magarian

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 24, 1932No. 40891PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

To a fair understanding of the legal questions involved, we gather the following facts from the record:

Walter E. Burgess, one of the plaintiffs herein, about April 1, 1911, became the owner of 13 acres of land in the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of section 32, township 78, range 24, West of 5 P. M., Polk county, Iowa, and on April 10, 1920, said acreage was duly platted under the name of “Fair-acres” into 64 lots, and the same is now included in and forms a part of the City of Des Moines, -Iowa. As thus platted, Fair-acres is bounded on the west by Beaver Avenue, on the south by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tobey v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  2. Doe ex dem. Thornton v. RoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
  3. Hegna v. PetersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Fuller v. ArmsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1873
  5. Shuler v. Independent Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Colón Padilla v. San Patricio Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
  2. Marshall v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Thodos v. ShirkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. Spencer v. MaverickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Sands v. Extensión Sagrado Corazón, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API