State v. Fontana
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
Defendant was convicted of murder in the second degree, Minn. St. 609.19, following a prosecution for murder in the first degree, § 609.185(1). Insanity was the defense. This appeal seeks reversal and remand for a new trial. It is alleged that the trial court erred in permitting the state to introduce testimony of a state-employed physician as to the mental capacity of defendant. The question presented for review is whether the physician-patient privilege accorded by § 595.02(4) applies between a state-employed physician and a patient committed to a state hospital for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. SwinburneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- State v. SappSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. EmersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Maas v. Midway Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. DodisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. StaatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State v. HembdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. EnebakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- STATE EX REL. JUVENILE DEPT., CLATSOP CTY v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.