Legal Opinion

State v. Fontana

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 28, 1967No. 39919PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

Defendant was convicted of murder in the second degree, Minn. St. 609.19, following a prosecution for murder in the first degree, § 609.185(1). Insanity was the defense. This appeal seeks reversal and remand for a new trial. It is alleged that the trial court erred in permitting the state to introduce testimony of a state-employed physician as to the mental capacity of defendant. The question presented for review is whether the physician-patient privilege accorded by § 595.02(4) applies between a state-employed physician and a patient committed to a state hospital for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. SwinburneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. State v. SappSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  3. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. State v. EmersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Maas v. Midway Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. DodisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. State v. StaatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. State v. HembdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. State v. EnebakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. STATE EX REL. JUVENILE DEPT., CLATSOP CTY v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API