Legal Opinion
State v. Enebak
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 6, 1978No. 47878PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, Justice.
Richard Enebak was found to have violated the terms of his probation and his original sentence was imposed. He challenges the procedures relating to his original conviction and also those relating to his probation revocation hearing. We affirm.
Enebak was charged with rape, indecent liberties, and aggravated assault in September 1969. He was committed to the State Hospital at St. Peter by the probate court in January 1970 as a psychopathic personality. With his consent, the criminal charges were transferred to the inactive trial calendar. In December 1974, Enebak entered a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Minnesota Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. BrouilletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Matter of Estate of CongdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. OdenbrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- In re D.M.C.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.