Legal Opinion
Amerada Hess Corp. v. Conrad
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1987No. Civ. 11351PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
Amerada Hess Corporation (Amerada) appeals from a declaratory judgment addressing various questions arising from the North Dakota Tax Commissioner’s (Commissioner) assessment of additional oil and gas gross production taxes, penalties, and interest against Amerada. The Commissioner has filed a cross-appeal from a part of the judgment. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
On June 4, 1985, the Commissioner issued to Amerada a Notice of Determination assessing additional gross production taxes, penalties, and interest in the total amount of $10,931,468, covering a ten-year…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Riley v. MartinelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Feldman v. GrangerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Patton v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Tax CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Tooley v. AlmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Bice v. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Gabriel v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & CasualtyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Karras v. State, Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.