Legal Opinion
Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 11, 1955No. 191PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Per curiam
In these cases Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin, 347 U. S. 672, that *45such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The Phillips case, therefore, controls this one.
We disagree with the contention of the appellees that Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co., 340 U. S. 179, and Phillips…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
3Cited by93 opinions
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hector Tito Lujan-Armendariz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Mauro Roldan-Santoyo v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Wazirali Moosa, Also Known as Wazir Ali Haider Ali Moosa Zebunisa Wazirali Moosa v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Puello v. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.