Legal Opinion

State v. Lakey

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1983No. 18250PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

Defendant gave a personal check to a seller of goods, with the request that he not cash it on that day so defendant would have time to make a deposit to meet it. When the deposit was not made because expected income was not received, defendant’s check was returned for insufficient funds and he was prosecuted for theft by deception. A jury, found him guilty, and he was sentenced to one to fifteen years. Concluding that there was insufficient evidence for a verdict of theft by deception, we reverse the conviction.

The facts are essentially undisputed. At defendant’s request, a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. DanielsUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. MurphyUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. BruceUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State v. HowdUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  5. State v. ForsheeUtah Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McNair v. HaywarddUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. RobertsUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. LeFevreCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  4. State v. NorenUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. DroddyUtah Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API