Legal Opinion

McNair v. Haywardd

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1983No. 18650PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

After a jury convicted appellant of retail theft, the trial court granted him a new trial. Another judge denied his petition for writ of habeas corpus, and he has filed this appeal of that denial. In the midst of a plethora of unmeritorious collateral attacks on his conviction, appellant’s pro se brief argues that it would be double jeopardy to subject him to a second trial on the facts of this case. Hudson v. Louisiana, 450 U.S. 40, 101 S.Ct. 970, 67 L.Ed.2d 30 (1981), which appellant does not cite, conclusively establishes that proposition if the issue is properly before us.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. FultonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. RudolphUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. Nelson-WaggonerUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. KayUtah Supreme Court · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API