Legal Opinion

San Diego Unified School District v. Commision on State Mandates

California Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2004No. S109125PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

Article XIII B, section 6, of the California Constitution provides: “Whenever the Legislature or any state agency mandates a new program or higher level of service on any local government, the State shall provide a subvention of funds to reimburse such local government for the costs of such program or increased level of service . . . ,” (Hereafter article XIII B, section 6.)

Plaintiff San Diego Unified School District (District), like all other public school districts in the state, is, and was at the time relevant in this proceeding, governed by statutes that regulate the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. County of San Diego v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. City of Sacramento v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. County of Los Angeles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Carmel Valley Fire Protection v. State of Calif.California Court of Appeal · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Department of Finance v. Commission on State MandatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Cnty. of San Diego v. Comm'n on State MandatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. County of Los Angeles v. Commission on State MandatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSN. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Department of Finance v. Commission on State MandatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API