Legal Opinion

CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSN. v. State

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 2009No. C055700PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NICHOLSON, Acting P. J.

The Legislature recently amended the law with respect to reimbursement to local governments for costs imposed as a result of ballot measures. The amended statute provides that the state need not provide reimbursement if “[t]he statute or executive order imposes duties that are necessary to implement, reasonably within the scope of, or expressly included in, a ballot measure approved by the voters in a statewide or local election. . . .” (Gov. Code, § 17556, subd. (f).) The Legislature also directed the Commission on State Mandates to set aside or reconsider…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Legislature v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Superior Court v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cnty. of San Diego v. Comm'n on State MandatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Harbor Regional Center v. Office of Administrative HearingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. California School Boards Ass'n v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Cal. Sch. Boards Ass'n v. State, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Cal. School Bds. Assn. v. State of Cal.California Supreme Court · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API