Legal Opinion

GRABER v. BORESKY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 2025No. 2:18-cv-03168Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JEREMY GRABER Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-3168 SPECIAL AGENT MICHAEL BORESKY Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Rufe, J. August 22, 2025 Plaintiff Jeremy Graber brought this lawsuit under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics,1 alleging that his constitutional rights were violated when he was arrested and then charged with a federal offense during a protest at the 2016 Democratic National Convention (“DNC”). Defendant Michael Boresky, a Secret Service agent,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.