School District No. 80 v. Lapping
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Morrison county to recover $209.88 •on the bond of plaintiff’s treasurer. The case was tried before Searle, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of defendants. From the judgment entered pursuant to the findings, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Action upon a treasurer’s bond. Defense, that the bond was executed ¡by respondents with the intention that it should become a binding ob*140ligation only in case of its execution by the treasurer as principal. Judgment entered for respondents.
F. D. Lapping, having been elected treasurer of school district number 80 in Morrison county, was required to execute and deliver a bond conditioned upon the faithful discharge of his duties. The bond was-prepared by the clerk, Martin, and respondents were requested by Lapping to execute the same as sureties. According to Martin, who-testified for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Berkey v. JuddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Martin v. HornsbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Garrett v. MannheimerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- State ex rel. Supervisors of Otto v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Van Norman v. BarbeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- La Belle Iron Works v. Quarter Savings BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
- Husak v. CliffordIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- County of Hennepin v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- In Re Guardianship of HamptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Whitlock v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.