Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

County of Hennepin v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 29, 1928No. Nos. 26,676, 26,677PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

On October 10, 1921, plaintiff and defendants Richardson & Ridge entered into a contract whereby Richardson & Ridge (hereinafter called the contractors) agreed to construct county ditch No. 35 of Hennepin county according to designated plans and specifications for the sum of $14,878.70. Defendant Union Indemnity Company executed a bond to plaintiff to secure the performance of the contract. The plans and specifications and the bid of the contractors are made a part of the contract, and it appears therefrom that the contractors were to perform all the work and furnish all the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Martin v. HornsbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. State ex rel. Supervisors of Otto v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Alden v. County of ToddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  4. City of Winona v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. Carli v. Seymour, Sabin & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1879

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Guardianship of HamptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. In Re Guardianship of HamptonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Groves v. John Wunder Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API