Legal Opinion

Whitlock v. Wood

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 22, 1937No. 4-4529PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrifetn Smith, C. J.

John Wood, Sr., and John Wood, Jr., father and son, as constable and deputy constable, respectively, and E. F. Hamer and Drennan Byars, official-bondsmen of John Wood, Sr., were sued by Eoy Whitlock, father and next friend of Ayers Whit-lock, a minor. It was alleged that Ayers Whitlock stopped where a game was in progress, and John Wood, Jr., acting as deputy constable, raided the group; that Whitlock started walking away and failed to halt when commanded by Wood to do so, as a consequence of which Wood shot and seriously wounded him.

The complaint recites the election of John Wood, Sr., in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Edgin v. TalleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  2. Thomas v. KinkeadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  3. Trustees of Schools v. SheikIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Moores v. WinterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  5. Frizzell v. DufferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crouch v. RichardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  2. Davidson, Sheriff v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API