Legal Opinion

In Re Guardianship of Hampton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 20, 1985No. C1-84-937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

This matter concerns the enforceability of a guardianship bond issued by petitioner Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Company (Empire) to secure the performance of Brenda Hampton, the former guardian of respondent Sam Hampton. The probate court declared that Empire was not legally bound on the bond; the Court of Appeals, 359 N.W.2d 740, reversed and ordered the surety discharged when it pays $21,000 to the present conservator. Empire petitioned this court for further review. We affirm in part, and reverse in part.

Sam Hampton was found to be mentally ill and dangerous in December,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. HornsbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. School District No. 80 v. LappingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. County of Hennepin v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. In Re Guardianship of HamptonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Nehring v. HainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richard L. Bowen & Associates, Inc. v. 1200 West Ninth Street Ltd. PartnershipOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State Bank of Bellingham v. BancInsure, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API