Legal Opinion · Dissent

Union Bank v. Wendland

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1976No. Civ. 33621Published

1DissentSims, J.

I respectfully dissent.

I agree with the conclusion that the record supports the trial court’s finding that the first deed of trust, which was given to secure a loan of $28,000 effected September I, 1967, was not a deed of trust given to a lender to secure repayment of a loan which was in fact used to pay all or part of the purchase price of the property. The property had been acquired October 21, 1965, partially with a loan from First Savings and *411Loan Association. Although the balance of that loan was paid off with a portion of the 1967 loan, part of the proceeds were used for other purposes.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Bargioni v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Tapia v. DemartiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Prunty v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API