United States v. Stuart Jeffrey Paskow
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
The issue in this case is whether the ex post facto clause is violated when a statutory amendment that increases a penalty to be imposed upon the revocation of supervised release is applied in a case in which the underlying offense was committed before the amendment was adopted but the conduct that led to revocation of supervised release occurred afterwards. We conclude that applying the amendment under such circumstances violates the ex post facto clause.
I
Stuart Jeffrey Paskow conspired to receive the proceeds of a bank robbery and received of the proceeds of a bank…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Russell v. GregoireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Michael E. WyattCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Larry J. MeeksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.