Rogers v. Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
We are asked to respond to nine questions certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit which focus on the right of involuntarily committed mental patients to refuse treatment, and the standards and procedures which must be followed to treat those patients with antipsychotic medication. 3 The basic conclusions we reach are that a committed mental patient is competent and has the right to make treatment decisions until the patient is adjudicated incompetent by a judge. If a patient is adjudicated incompetent, a judge, using a substituted-judgment standard, shall decide…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Superintendent of Belchertown State School v. SaikewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Rivers v. KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re C.E.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. v. Commissioner of Department of Mental RetardationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- In Re CEIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Rubie Rogers v. Robert Okin, M.D., Etc., Rubie Rogers v. Robert Okin, M.D., Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.