Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Action Against Glasser

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 2013No. A11-2126PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (“the Director”) petitioned for disciplinary action against respondent Susanne Marie Glas-ser, alleging that she violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(b) based on her conviction of two counts of misdemeanor theft by swindle. Following a hearing on the petition, a referee recommended a public reprimand and supervised probation for a period of five years. The Director disputes several of the referee’s findings of fact regarding mitigation and the recommended sanction. The Director asserts that a suspension from the practice…

3Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against TigueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against SeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against BonnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  4. In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Michael John RIEHM, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0296570Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  5. In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Robert D. STONEBURNER, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0105909Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API