Legal Opinion

Coley v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1928No. Docket No. 6109PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

The petitioners seek by this proceeding in certiorari to have annulled two orders dated respectively August 9 and August 26, 1927, made by the respondent Court in an action in forcible detainer commenced by Grace Lanza against the petitioners Hogan, Craig, and others to obtain possession of an apartment house in San Francisco to which she claimed to have acquired title by purchase at trustee’s sale. The orders challenged were made subsequent to a - dismissal of the action by plaintiff, but before the action was tried, and relate to the restoration of the property.

It appears from the record…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Field v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. Hildebrand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Baughman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Marks v. KeenanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Broder v. ConklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Werner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Colby v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Barham v. KhouryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API