Baughman v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Application for a writ of prohibition. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.
Petitioner, as surviving partner of the firm of Ruoff and Baughman, prosecuted an action in the Superior Court against one R. B. Reed, and in the prayer of his complaint, amongst other demands, asked that a receiver be named to take charge, “ pending the action,” of certain grain, in which, in said complaint, he claimed an interest. Upon the complaint, the superior judge appointed one A. J. Wilson receiver “to take charge of, and hold, preserve, and keep,” the grain, “and for that purpose to take such measures and employ such help as may be requisite.”
Wilson qualified as receiver, and took…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Field v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Very v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Ireland v. NicholsThe Superior Court of New York City · 1870
3Cited by18 opinions
- Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Ell v. Northern Pacific RailroadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- Shell Petroleum Corporation v. GraysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Coley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Burge v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.