Legal Opinion
KS Corp. v. Chemstrand Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 29, 1961PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
METZNER, District Judge.
Defendant Chemstrand Corporation moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b) (1, 6) and 12(h) (2), 28 U.S.C.
Plaintiff instituted a suit consisting of three causes of action, the first and third being asserted against Chemstrand Corporation alone and the second being asserted against both Chemstrand and Fabrex Corp. jointly. The first cause of action charges Chemstrand with a violation of the Robinson-Patman Act (15 U.S.C.A. § 13 (d, e)) for alleged discrimination against plaintiff and in favor of Fabrex in sales promotions and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Thomson v. GaskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- FLM Collision Parts, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- American News Company and the Union News Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Inland Rubber Corporation v. Triple a Tire Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Distillers Co. Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.