Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Fred Meyer, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 18, 1968No. 27PublishedCited by 144 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Warren
The Federal Trade Commission, after extensive proceedings, ruled that respondents, the corporate owner of a chain of supermarkets and two of its officers, had unlawfully induced certain suppliers to engage in discriminatory pricing and sales promotional activities prohibited by §§ 2 (a) and 2 (d) of the Clayton Act, as amended *343by the Robinson-Patman Act.1 63 F. T. C.-(1963). The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit disagreed with the Commission’s construction of § 2 (d) and reversed in part its ruling that the section had been violated. 359 F. 2d 351 (1966). We granted certiorari, 386 U. S.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Federal Trade Commission v. BrochSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc., and Mission Gas Oil Company, Inc. And Petroleum Products Co. v. Texaco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Perkins v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. William D. Ruckelshaus, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, (3 Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Abbott Laboratories v. Portland Retail Druggists Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lewis v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.