Legal Opinion
Inland Rubber Corporation v. Triple a Tire Service, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 13, 1963PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TYLER, District Judge.
Defendants move to dismiss this action, which sounds in tort and in contract, for lack of jurisdiction of this court of the subject matter. Plaintiff claims that jurisdiction is based on diverse citizenship of the parties (28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) (1)); specifically, it alleges that plaintiff is a citizen of Ohio and that defendants are citizens of New York. Defendants maintain that the corporate plaintiff is in fact a citizen of New York, and that, hence, there is no diversity of citizenship.
Plaintiff, Inland Rubber Corporation (Inland), is incorporated in Ohio and is the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mollan v. TorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Scot Typewriter Co. v. Underwood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- In Re Hudson River Nav. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- KS Corp. v. Chemstrand CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- In re S. O. S Sheet Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Industrial Tectonics, Inc. v. Aero Alloy, a California Corporation Die Cast Products, Inc., a California Corporation, AKA Metal Products GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Tosco Corp. v. Communities for a Better EnvironmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Quaker State Dyeing & Finishing Co., Inc. v. Itt Terryphone CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- R. G. Barry Corporation v. Mushroom Makers, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Lee J. Topp v. Compair Incorporated, Compair Limited, Siebe Plc and E. Barrie StephensCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.