Legal Opinion

Martin v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 8, 1917No. 9015PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Defendant was convicted for a violation of the non-support act. Error to the Juvenile Court, City and County of Denver, Hon. Ben B. Lindsey, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill

*61The plaintiff in error was convicted for the violation of our so-called non-support act (chapter 179, Laws 1911) for his willful failure to support his infant child. The errors assigned challenge the validity of this act, as well as the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. It is urged that the act is in conflict with both state and federal Constitutions; that it is meaningless, ambiguous, uncertain, and unintelligible; that it makes any distinction between a prosecution for a felony or misdemeanor dependent upon the whim or caprice of the trial judge, etc. A large portion of counsel’s, brief…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Forsyth v. . Court of SessionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. State v. EverittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Marks v. WentworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Grundel v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  5. People v. StickleMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. EnlowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. State Ex Rel. Gordon v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. People v. ElliottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  4. People Ex Rel. Bear Creek Development Corp. v. District Court of the Second DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. Denver Milk Producers, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API