Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1986No. 413PA85PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

We allowed defendant’s petition for discretionary review to consider the following question: Whether the trial court commit ted reversible error by instructing the jury in this armed robbery case that: “The term ‘dangerous weapon’ also includes pistols which look like firearms such as cap pistols. An instrument is a dangerous weapon if it is apparently a weapon capable of inflicting a life threatening injury.” We answer the question affirmatively and reverse the Court of Appeals.

The state’s evidence tended to show as follows: A black male wearing a ski mask entered the Quick…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. JamesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. State v. WestallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. BartleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. State v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API