Legal Opinion
Weismantle v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 12, 1924PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, J.:
Claimant owns a farm of about 450 acres located on both sides of a small creek called Wood creek, in the town of Verona, Oneida county, N. Y. She claims that some 225 acres of said farm have been permanently damaged by reason of work in connection with the construction of the Barge canal.
*609It is the contention of claimant that the waters of Wood creek have been diverted and the bed of the stream has been lowered several feet at a point where it empties into Fish creek, which is now a part of the Barge canal, so that the stream which had always been sluggish and crooked has been…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Fulton L., H. P. Co. v. . State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Comm'rs of Canal Fund v. KempshallNew York Supreme Court · 1841
- American Woolen Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Hinkley v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
3Cited by11 opinions
- Queensboro Farm Products, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1956
- Rochford v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1934
- Rizzo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1951
- Reese v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1947
- Clough v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.