Legal Opinion
Reese v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided July 22, 1947No. Claim No. 27904PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLambiase, J.
Claimants, who are husband and wife, at all times herein mentioned, were the owners of a parcel of land with a dwelling and other structures located thereon, consisting of 80 acres, more or less, situate in the town of Southport, county of Chemung, New York. At all times herein mentioned, Seeley Creek, a nonnavigable stream, flowed in a general northerly direction through claimants’ land, dividing it into a parcel of 35 acres westerly and 45 acres easterly thereof. Twenty or 25 acres of the so-called westerly parcel were situated between the west bank of said creek and an abandoned railroad…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Smith v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Matter of Board of Water Supply of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Bellinger v. . the New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- South Buffalo Railway Co. v. KirkoverNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Oswego Syracuse R.R. Co. v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kohlasch v. New York State Thruway AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Polin v. Chung ChoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Trustees of Southampton v. HeilnerNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- West v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1954
- Kosciuszko v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.