Legal Opinion

Queensboro Farm Products, Inc. v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided September 17, 1956No. Claim No. 32788PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCharles T. Major, J.

This is a claim for de facto and statutory appropriation of claimant’s property. Claimant owned a large main building and other- structures constituting a milk receiving plant, which was located on lands leased from the New York Central Railroad Company, with right of ingress and egress over other railroad lands. This lease contained a 30-day cancellation clause and a provision that claimant, by complying with the terms of the lease, had the right to remove all buildings and materials. Claimant’s milk plant and property occupied by its plant manager abutted Indian Castle Road. This road ran…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jackson v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Matter of City of New York (Allen St.)New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Lewis v. Ocean Navigation & Pier Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Kahlen v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Matter of City of New York (Whitlock Ave.)New York Court of Appeals · 1938

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. City of Buffalo v. StrozziNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  3. In re the City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Hylan Flying Service, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Wolfe v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API