Legal Opinion
Rochford v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided September 20, 1934No. Claim No. 23586PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
Claimants were seized and in possession of a parcel of land consisting of seventy-one one-hundredths of an acre situate in the town and village of Van Etten, Chemung county. Their title extended back to January 3, 1838, and the land laid between the Susquehanna turnpike, now Waverly street, on the east and the Seneca Lake road, now Main street, on the north. Susquehanna turnpike, or Waverly street, runs in a direction from southwest to northeast and Seneca Lake road, or Main street, runs in a direction from slightly northwest to slightly southeast. They intersect at an acute angle, their…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fulton L., H. P. Co. v. . State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Miller v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Van Aken v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- American Woolen Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Adamo v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Queensboro Farm Products, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1956
- City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Porter v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1957
- Reese v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1947
- Huey v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.