Legal Opinion

Sorrell v. Scheuer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 19, 1923No. 4 Div. 57PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The questions for review arose on the introduction or rejection of evidence in the court below in the suit of Harry Scheuer against J. F. Sorrell, doing business under the firm name of J. A. Sessions & Co. and J. F. Sorrell, as a member of that firm. Defendant Sorrell answered the complaint, saying that he, was not and had not been doing business under said firm name, etc., and that he was not a member of any such partnership as that indicated. To this answer plaintiff replied that defendant is es-topped from setting up that he is not a member of said firm, and not hound for the debts…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ala. Great Southern R. R. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Prince v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Cox v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Xenia Bank v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Yuncke v. WelkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Roan v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  3. Perry v. BrakefieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Alabama Power Company v. TatumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. Smitherman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API